One years CO2 emissions on this planet is the equivalent of 20 billion trees ability to sequester it.
We need to completely restore the planets bio regional eagle habitats with the correct species and native flora and fauna. That is unarguable.
That is a completely separate issue from carbon sequestration by trees. On the absolute maximum scale, even if done correctly, statistically insignificant number.
4) i’m not even going to list its name. I would take an industrial complex to even do that process. Ridiculous. Let alone and incredibly wasteful and unimaginative idea that might work if it was to scale back would lower the quality of life for everyone on the planet. Just asinine. Probably a fossil fuel proposal.
This is the pre-requisite. And absolute. But, storage is asinine and only proposed by entities who stand to lose market share or the entire market. If you can capture carbon from the atmosphere you can form into any solid you wish. From furniture, to nano particles, structural pieces for any architecture and obviously carbon fiber.
Currently there are at least 10 entities doing this very thing for $1000 per 10 or less. Given that quality carbon fiber retails for $32,000 per time, it is the greatest economic opportunity in the history of legal tender. To allow any “storage” would be a record amount of moral bankruptcy.
1) reforestation
One years CO2 emissions on this planet is the equivalent of 20 billion trees ability to sequester it.
We need to completely restore the planets bio regional eagle habitats with the correct species and native flora and fauna. That is unarguable.
That is a completely separate issue from carbon sequestration by trees. On the absolute maximum scale, even if done correctly, statistically insignificant number.
I have a hard time excepting your legitimacy. A real journalist would’ve investigated those particular dynamics to the level that I inform you of.
4) i’m not even going to list its name. I would take an industrial complex to even do that process. Ridiculous. Let alone and incredibly wasteful and unimaginative idea that might work if it was to scale back would lower the quality of life for everyone on the planet. Just asinine. Probably a fossil fuel proposal.
3) Direct air capture
This is the pre-requisite. And absolute. But, storage is asinine and only proposed by entities who stand to lose market share or the entire market. If you can capture carbon from the atmosphere you can form into any solid you wish. From furniture, to nano particles, structural pieces for any architecture and obviously carbon fiber.
Currently there are at least 10 entities doing this very thing for $1000 per 10 or less. Given that quality carbon fiber retails for $32,000 per time, it is the greatest economic opportunity in the history of legal tender. To allow any “storage” would be a record amount of moral bankruptcy.
2)ERW
A ridiculous proposal by the fossil fuel entities doing what they do best. Wasting a valuable resource and lying.
Quite simply, a stupid, self-serving yet mastered technology proposal by people who are not announcing their true agenda.